Gallery

If the GBBO Final were the Tour de France…

So there you have it, the game has come to a close. It was John, in the tent with a hairdryer that did it. But what did he ‘do’?

Inevitably there has been considerable debate regarding the choice and whether he ‘deserved’ the title or whether other candidates were more worthy winners. If GBBO were managed as this year’s Tour then there is no doubt that James was the Mark Cavendish of the piece, more wins on each stage of the competition and good on bread and pastry but as suspect on cake making and decoration as Cavendish is known to be on the hills. Ultimately by choosing a chiffon cake as the showstopper for the Final, then James was hampered by his relative lack of skill in this area if the pack were still together on the Final hill climb.

Similarly as far as many of us were concerned during filming, Brendan was the Brad Wiggins of the piece. Fewer stage wins overall than Cavendish but just so consistent and able that if GBBO had been assessed in its totality like the real Tour, then Brendan was clearly ahead. Like Wiggins, Brendan had a good all round ability that meant that he could tackle anything and in the entire 30 bakes he really only had 4 that were shaky and put him anywhere near the bottom. Brendan is more of a cook than a baker (as am I) and we both approach baking as a sub-discipline of the genre (we are foodies with all the good and bad connotations that term brings). Both boys by contrast had considerably more ‘near failures’ over the totality of their baking, but were able to soar ahead of the pack when the conditions suited them (James in doughnuts, John in the plaited loaf) as they are both truly bakers at heart.

If however that was the case, why did Brendan not win in the way that Wiggins won the Tour? We can all look for the hidden gunman on the grassy knoll (Paul’s alleged dislike of ‘older’ or ‘professional’ contestants who make him feel threatened, the desire of the TV company to provide a personable, attractive winner who might go on to a media career and improve the image of the GBBO product are two of my favourite motives for the assassin’s shot) but there is no need to apportion ‘blame’ anywhere else other than ourselves.

GBBO is not a competition that rewards consistency or even finds the ‘best’ amateur home baker, despite journalists and judges sadly on occasion, playing fast and loose with those terms. It is a knockout baking tournament filmed for a TV audience and with associated merchandising. It is a business and the tournament option suits the format better. Independent TV production companies are businesses although within their portfolios they may have certain themes and emphases (Love productions does, as outside of GBBO it has concentrated on social programming), and the BBC as the public service broadcaster is buying their product using our money. With that kind of business arrangement it is important that the time and effort put into the product development is returned by a successful series and further BBC commissioning. Even though I was gripped remotely by the Tour, it is a different sort of experience following a cumulative event, more one of worrying if Wiggins could really win barring technical disasters with the bike (read dropped cake on the floor) than providing an environment for jumping up and down on the sofa and shouting at the TV. I didn’t need to see the race to follow the results and the way the race was developing. We however want a competition that engages us right to the end and the TV company are shrewd enough to know that the only way to provide that and grow a TV audience over a 10 week show is to build cumulatively. We don’t want a coronation, we want sport and preferably a little bit down and dirty. Middle class mud wrestling anyone? :-)

Do you remember the first time Boris Becker won Wimbledon? His route to the Final had been a little shaky and no one could quite understand how a completely unseeded 17 year old could have got there when his World ranking was so low. I still remember that Final and he was a worthy winner having played quite incredible tennis that day. When it came down to Championship point, John had served an ace with his cake: it was a style and a concept that had “Paul Hollywood” written all over it as surely as his choice of actual words, and it was baked to a standard that Mary approved of. Judges, journalists and public have all misused terms like ’best’ and ‘most consistent‘ when discussing how the winner of this year’s GBBO will be identified. Our contracts (legal documents with carefully chosen words) only make mention of the fact that a person will be chosen who is deemed to be the winner (and there’s no money or direct book deal associated with winning), to allow for the fact, that like in the Olympic Final, Andy Murray can meet Roger Federer and completely justify winning the gold medal on his performance in that match regardless of their world rankings, the beauty of their tennis, or the apparent ‘likeability’ of their characters.

That is why John is the winner of series 3 of GBBO. He was not the most consistent baker in the tournament and the tournament is not really finding the ‘best‘ amateur baker (that person may never enter), but he is the winner of the Bake Off tournament for 2012 and has every right to that title. I wholeheartedly and publicly offer him my congratulations. Baking is not an easy field to enter, the hours are long and compared to the professions poorly paid (even PH’s alleged BBC salary does not compare to a partner in a London commercial firm), and when our 15 minutes of fame are up, it will be difficult to avoid looking as purposeless as the empty Campbell’s soup can. He is a young man with considerable ambition and drive and the people around him will hopefully help him focus that to turn his ‘shock’ win into a sustainable career. Boris became a star in the tennis firmament for the quality of his playing and focus in training. John will hopefully do the same in his chosen career by following up his stated plan of further patisserie training to give him credibility as a professional and not just a very talented amateur that will sustain a career. Good Luck John, it would never be my choice, but I admire you for wanting to try something different for yourself and I hope it continues to bring you happiness and contentment.  :-)

BTW the lovely Team BB picture was done by Tom Bowler http://www.sparkyshark.com and sent to Brendan via twitter and now on his FB page.

About these ads

13 Responses to If the GBBO Final were the Tour de France…

  1. Your analogy to Wimbledon is probably more correct than le Tour, as I felt that John could have easily gone out on some weeks but possibly survived when others had worse weeks overall. In the end I think that from what the TV showed us of the final that he was a worthy winner, it was possibly the comment from Paul H that Brendans technical bakes were overall his weakest area, but from your blog yesterday I felt that either the production company did Brendan no favours or he was very full of himself (from the 10 out of 10 comment after the signature bake) but John was shown in a more homely and natural setting, that meant that even though our family wanted James to win we weren’t unhappy that John did. However I am still firmly behind Cav

    • I feel that the editing was very unfair to Brendan. If I were being cynical I’d say that they set things up in such a way that people would want John or James to win even through Brendan was evidently the strongest baker. And as for the comment that he was weak on the technical challenges, didn’t he come first on two occasions (creme caramels and queen of puddings)? As I recall John only came first once (plaited loaf). So, this rather confirms my suspicions…

  2. A nicely reasoned piece that cuts through the hype to explain what sells this tv programme, what makes a”winner” and what the future might bring. (Hopefully mores than an Andy Warhol quarter-of -an-hour)

  3. Loved your sports and baking piece – I’m glad John won, although I was routing for James before, but the final weekend just wasn’t great for him.

  4. When the captions at the end reported that John had achieved a First in his Law degree but was hoping to train as a Patissiere (is that the right word? Is that how you spell it?) I couldn’t help thinking if I was his Mum I’m not sure how happy I’d be about that! ;-)

  5. Julie – if I was his Mum I’d be happy as long as he was pursuing his dream.

    Danny – excellently reasoned piece, puts into words what I’ve been trying to say to people all day!

    • Thanks all for comments on this piece. Baking is a tough world and the TV cooks who have sustained careers are actually cooks not bakers and usually have something interesting to say about their subject. As GBBO contestants we are completely unknown quantities really in terms of potential longevity and having anything like that to interest the public. I can think of at least one cooking show in the recent past that sank after one series (despite the presenter on paper having excellent TV credentials) because there was nothing to draw the viewer in and buy the book. However professional training does bridge the gap, and whilst TV series are hard even for ‘proper’ professionals to get, there is always the option of running a very successful business. It’s the model that has worked very well for baking and TV baking shows with the Herberts, Eric Lanlard, and now PH moving to TV from a basis of running a business.
      I have the same law degree as John and have never practised but don’t see it as a waste so can see his point that he doesn’t feel he is pursuing the wrong avenue. It’s just that he’s leaving a very certain professional world for a less certain one given his abilities. But then speaking from my ‘safe’ professional environment where I am happy with my choices and with a mother who always said to me “as long as you’re happy…” I would say that wouldn’t I? :-) I wish for all my fellow contestants that the choices they make after involvement in the show bring them satisfaction too.

  6. You have a law degree, a medical degree and can bake like that? Move over Wonder Woman!

  7. What Katy Said! You really are a very talented woman!

    I want my kids to be happy, honest! But if one of them was bright enough to do so well at Uni but what made them happy was a much more uncertain career path, of course I’d support them (and be happy to grow fat on the result of their art) but I couldn’t help but worry, it’s part of the job description, isn’t it? ;-)

  8. He’s always got a “trade” to fall back on :D

  9. Great post Danny. You all did so well even to be selected for the programme as I’m sure there was tough competition out there. Keep up the good work and enjoy baking.

  10. Very illuminating post, thank you – and crikey, my mind is just boggling at your amazing range of talents. I do wish we got another chance to see Brendan on our screens though – he was the highlight of our Bake Off, closely followed by you!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s